Monthly DCA Performance & Conduct Review
Standardised template · Aligned to DCA Governance Framework (Layer 5)
[DCA name] · [Reporting month YYYY-MM]
Use this deck to standardise the meeting and align to the framework. Populate from the Standard Monthly Reporting Pack (Layer 3).
Contacts & RACI (who to contact)
Update names in your copy
| Topic | Bank | DCA |
|---|---|---|
| Day-to-day / operations | Collections lead | Account / Operations lead |
| Performance & SLA | Head of Collections | Account director |
| Conduct / complaints / breach | Compliance (escalate to Risk per Layer 6) | Senior |
| Contract / commercial / delegation | Legal / Collections | Commercial |
| Attestation / risk oversight | Risk (second line) | Senior (signed attestation) |
| Escalation (Layer 6) | Risk; CRO (material privacy) | n/a |
Governance at a glance
Cadence + escalation
- Weekly: Operational review (volume, pipeline, SLA, handbacks).
- Monthly: This meeting - Performance & Conduct; Monthly Pack required.
- Quarterly: Risk & attestation review; DCA attestation due.
- Quarterly: Risk Committee reporting (DCA summary).
- Annual: Contract & incentive review; Delegated Authority Schedule.
- Escalation: SLA >2m → remediation plan; Conduct → Risk; Delegation breach → suspend authority; Hardship delay → independent review; Privacy → CRO.
Reporting requirements (Layer 3)
What to submit, when
- Standard Monthly Reporting Pack - identical format for all DCAs.
- Sections: 1 Portfolio · 2 Performance · 3 Conduct · 4 Delegated authority · 5 Risk indicators · 6 Spin down (recoveries by referral month).
- Submission: e.g. 5 business days after month end; format Excel per template.
- Naming: DCA_MonthlyPack_[DCA_Name]_[YYYY-MM].xlsx.
- Attestation: Quarterly; use NZ_DCA_Compliance_Attestation_Checklist.
Meeting details
Layer 5 - Governance Cadence
- Purpose: Monthly Performance & Conduct Review.
- Participants: Bank - Head of Collections / Collections lead; DCA - Account director / senior lead.
- Duration: e.g. 60 minutes.
- Input: Standard Monthly Reporting Pack (Layer 3) submitted by DCA by agreed deadline.
- Output: Agreed actions; minutes; scorecard and pack on file; escalation to Risk if required (Layer 6).
Agenda (standard)
Same order every month · Every DCA
- 1. Portfolio snapshot (Layer 3 - Section 1)
- 2. Performance (Layer 3 - Section 2)
- 3. Conduct (Layer 3 - Section 3)
- 4. Delegated authority (Layer 3 - Section 4)
- 5. Risk indicators & open issues (Layer 3 - Section 5; Layer 4)
- 6. Spin down - recoveries by referral month (Layer 3 - Section 6)
- 7. Scorecard (R/A/G)
- 8. Action items & next steps
1. Portfolio snapshot
Layer 3 - Section 1 · Populate from Monthly Pack
| Metric | This month | Prior month | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reporting month | [YYYY-MM] | n/a | |
| Accounts assigned (opening / new / closing) | |||
| $ exposure (opening / closing) | |||
| Age at assignment (new): 0-30, 31-60, 61-90, 90+ DPD | |||
| Segment mix (new) | |||
| Accounts closed (by reason) | Paid, Settled, Hardship, Legal, Write-off, Returned, Other |
2. Performance
Layer 3 - Section 2 · Populate from Monthly Pack
| Metric | Value | Prior month | Target | R/A/G |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $ collected | n/a | |||
| Recovery rate (%) | By segment | |||
| Cure rate (%) | By segment | |||
| PTP keep rate (%) | e.g. ≥ 70% | |||
| Time to first contact (% within 5 b.d.) | e.g. ≥ 95% | |||
| Non-treatment > 14 days (count, %) | e.g. < 5% |
3. Conduct
Layer 3 - Section 3 · Populate from Monthly Pack
| Metric | Value | Prior month | Expectation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Complaints (internal / FSL) | n/a | ||
| Complaints per 1,000 accounts | Below threshold | ||
| Hardship referrals | n/a | ||
| Hardship referral timing (% within 1 b.d.) | Per protocol | ||
| Contact compliance (%) | 100% | ||
| QA pass rate (%) | e.g. ≥ 85% | ||
| Disclosure compliance (breaches) | 0 |
4. Delegated authority
Layer 3 - Section 4 · Populate from Monthly Pack
| Metric | Value | Threshold | Over threshold (Y/N) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Settlement volume (count, $) | n/a | ||
| Settlements by band (≤70%, 71-80%, >80% approved) | Per Schedule | ||
| Waivers within limit / above limit (bank approved) | Per Schedule | ||
| Overrides | n/a | ||
| Unauthorised settlement / waiver | 0 | If > 0 = Category B |
5. Risk indicators & open issues
Layer 3 - Section 5 · Layer 4 (Issue Log)
| Indicator | Value | Threshold | R/A/G |
|---|---|---|---|
| Non-treatment > X days | e.g. < 5% | ||
| Accounts > 90 DPD still early stage | Monitor | ||
| Legal timing breaches | 0 | ||
| Disclosure breaches | 0 | ||
| Attestation status | Y | ||
| Open issues (A / B / C / D) | n/a |
Review Issue Log; agree remediation and owners. Material issues (Category A, suspension) → Risk Committee.
6. Scorecard summary (R/A/G)
Overall DCA scorecard - align to framework definitions
- Performance: recovery, cure, PTP, time to contact, non-treatment
- Conduct: complaints, hardship referral timing, contact compliance, QA, disclosure
- Delegated authority: no unauthorised settlement/waiver
- Risk indicators: open issues, attestation status
Overall status: [ ] Green [ ] Amber [ ] Red
7. Action items & next steps
Output of this meeting
| # | Action | Owner | Due date |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | |||
| 2 | |||
| 3 |
Escalation to Risk required? (Layer 6) [ ] Yes [ ] No
Next monthly review date: _______________
Pack and minutes to be filed per Layer 5.
Escalation reminder (Layer 6)
If any trigger applies, escalate as defined
| Trigger | Escalation |
|---|---|
| SLA miss > 2 months | Formal remediation plan |
| Conduct breach | Immediate escalation to Risk |
| Delegated authority breach | Suspension of authority |
| Repeated hardship delay | Independent review |
| Material privacy issue | CRO escalation |
Appendix: Framework alignment
This meeting is the Monthly Performance & Conduct Review (Layer 5)
- Agenda follows the Standard Monthly Reporting Pack (Layer 3) - five sections.
- Issues discussed must be classified and logged per Layer 4 (Issue Identification Model).
- Any trigger per Layer 6 (Escalation Framework) must be escalated as defined.
- No DCA is exempt from this cadence (DCA Governance Policy, Layer 1).